A unique material for a study of damage and aging

According to Allan Kozinn’s February 23, 2013 article in The New York Times, “A Plain White Square and Yet So Fascinating“, the exhibit, “We Buy White Albums” (on view at Recess Gallery, 41 Grand Street, New York City through March 9, 2013), is an installation of several hundred examples of the Beatles’ “The White Album” which were collected by Rutherford Chang. For those who are too young to know the record firsthand, the one color album cover was embossed with the title and each album carried a unique serial number. In the article, Chang is quoted as saying, “I was interested in the different ways that covers aged. Being an all white cover, the changes are apparent.” Back in 1968 when the album was first released, who would have thought of its cover as material for the study of damage and aging of paper.

An abundance of College Art Association meeting sessions on conservation, technical art history, and the material aspects of works of art

In a typical year, one or two sessions at the annual meeting of the College Art Association focus on conservation or the material aspects of works of art. The 2013 meeting which took place in New York City on February 13-16 included seven sessions on these subjects– “The Proof is in the Print: Avant-Garde Approaches to the Historical Materials of Photography’s Avant Garde”, “Destruction of Cultural Heritage in European Countries in Transition, 1990- 2011”, “Collaborative Understanding through Technical Investigations: Art Scholar, Conservators and Scientists Research in Tandem”, “Between Maker, Agent, Collector, Curator and Conservator: Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Study of Islamic Tilework”, “Technical Art History and the University Curriculum”, “The New Connoisseurship: A Conversation among Scholars, Curators and Conservators”, “Artists and the Manufacturing of Art Materials”– with a number of them stressing collaboration. Some day in the future will we look back to this meeting and see it as the beginning of a golden age of conservator-art historian collaboration?

Why We Assist in Disasters

In a series of posts on the University of Iowa Libraries Preservation Beat blog, Nancy Kraft, AIC-CERT team member and Preservation Librarian, reflects on her work at the Cultural Recovery Center in Brooklyn.
Friday, February 15, 2013
Those of us who volunteer to assist in disaster response are, obviously, not in it for the money. Private conservators are not getting paid while volunteering. Many of us are away from family and friends, work hard and go to bed exhausted during recovery efforts. So what is in it for us?
For me, as for many of us, it is the giving back to our community, assisting in saving our culture, and the joy of helping someone preserve a little bit of his/her history. The piece below is a perfect example. I captured the title “For Matthew, May 14-May 15, 1976″ commemorating the birth of the artist’s son.
For-Matthew
Read more of  Nancy’s posts here:
Teaching Moments at CRC
Busy Day at the Cultural Recovery Center in Brooklyn
An Artist’s Quandary
Assessment and Cleaning
Assisting Artists After Hurricane Sandy
Salvaging Artists’ Works After Hurricane Sandy
Testing-for-mold
Read the University of Iowa Libraries Preservation Beat blog: http://blog.lib.uiowa.edu/preservation/
With thanks to Nancy Kraft and the University of Iowa Libraries for permission to re-post this information on our blog.

Cultural Recovery Center Update


CERT TrainingFAIC Responds to Cultural Disasters

Founded in 2007, the AIC Collections Emergency Response Team (AIC-CERT) is comprised of conservators and other museum professionals trained to respond to disasters affecting cultural institutions. Managed by the Foundation of the American Institute for Conservation (FAIC), AIC-CERT volunteers have provided assistance and advice to dozens of museums, libraries, and archives in the wake of natural disasters including tropical storms, floods, hurricanes, and even the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. In 2007 and again in 2010, FAIC received funding from the Institute of Museum & Library Services to support an advanced training program that resulted in a force of 107 “rapid responders” adept at assessing damage and initiating salvage of cultural collections after a disaster has occurred.
AIC-CERT: the SWAT Team for Art
Hurricane Sandy caused an enormous amount of damage and loss of life. The storm was equally disastrous for the arts and culture community. It struck the Northeast at the end of October, 2012 and combined with other weather patterns and high tides to form a “Super Storm.” Requests for assistance quickly came in through the AIC-CERT hotline and from Alliance for Response New York City (AFRNYC). Many collecting institutions throughout the region were affected, but small galleries and individual artists were especially hard hit in the low-lying neighborhoods of New York City.
By March 1, 23 AIC-CERT members will have contributed 125 days of professional volunteer services in New York and New Jersey.

“If the cultural industry has a SWAT team for visual art, it is the AIC’s Collections Emergency Response Team (AIC-CERT)”
– Pia Catton, Wall Street Journal, November 18, 2012

Before the storm hit, AIC-CERT had already begun preparations. Media releases on October 26 encouraged emergency preparedness and provided institutions with the AIC-CERT hotline number (202-661-8068). As of December 4, 2012, FAIC’s Collections Emergency Response Team (AIC-CERT) hotline had received over 120 requests for assistance, and all have been followed up with appropriate phone, email, and in-person visits by volunteers. Fourteen AIC-CERT members from across the country responded to the initial calls, organized by Beth Antoine (the AIC-CERT Coordinator), who was working overtime to meet the demand. In addition, FAIC contracted with Cynthia Albertson, a conservator at MOMA, to coordinate the many professionals in the New York area who wished to assist. Twenty-eight local volunteers worked with AIC-CERT in the initial response. Some of the larger projects included the Martha Graham collection; individual artists at the Westbeth Artists Residence; and various artists and galleries in Chelsea and Brooklyn. Multi-day power outages in lower Manhattan and other neighborhoods, subway line closures, and area gas rationing complicated the response.Martha Graham Dance Co.
Because of the physical, cultural, and economic geography of the New York region, a disproportionate number of artists and private galleries were the hardest hit by the storm. Four to six feet of surging water caused physical damage as well as water damage. Although volunteers were able to help move and dry materials in the first weeks, it became clear that artists would need a great deal of space, guidance, and equipment in order to remove toxic coatings and prevent mold from destroying works that seemed to be “saved.” A review of the services provided through early December showed that at least 24 collections were in need of further work, and that space, equipment, and expert advice would be needed.
The Cultural Recovery Center
To address the need for further assistance, FAIC opened the Cultural Recovery Center (CRC), an 18,000 square foot space in Brooklyn, to provide space, equipment, supplies, and volunteer expertise to assist artists and owners of damaged works to clean, decontaminate, and stabilize their paintings, works on paper, sculpture, textiles, photographs, and other objects. FAIC took possession of the space on December 10, and begin providing services to its first artist on December 13.
Opening the facility not only required physical preparation, but administrative support as well. Policies and procedures for the facility were developed; a job description for the studio manager position was created; phone numbers and email addresses organized, and so on. The Studio Manager, Anna Studebaker, formerly manager of the objects conservation lab at the Metropolitan Museum, began work on December 18. She coordinates the work at the CRC, including scheduling artists, signing volunteers in and out, making sure volunteers are working safely, maintaining records of the work, ensuring supplies are in stock, and keeping in communication with the volunteer coordinators and FAIC staff. The overall project is managed by Eric Pourchot, FAIC Institutional Advancement Director.
In the first month of operations, the CRC worked with seven artists on 555 works, including paintings, works on papers, photographs, textiles, and multi-media works. Twelve conservators volunteered 22 days of time working with artists at the Center.
CRC_1    CRC_2
Several artists are still in the queue to bring their works to the Center, including a painter who has had many of his paintings and works on paper worked on at the Center already, but has more in storage still to be assessed and cleaned; a photographer who is seeking space to rinse and dry approximately 40,000 images; textile artists; sculptors; electronic media creators; and many others whose works are at risk because of toxic deposits and potential mold growth. The Cultural Recovery Center will remain open through March 1st in order to handle the requests for services.
This would not have been possible without …
Initial funding for the response and recovery efforts, including initial costs for the Center, was provided by a leadership gift to FAIC from Sotheby’s. A grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation allowed the Center to remain open through March 1. Industry City at Bush Terminal provided the space rent-free. Rapid Refile set up containment tents and air scrubbers to prevent the spread of mold from incoming objects to cleaned objects. Collector Systems has provided free use of its web-based collection management system. The Smithsonian Institution and a grant to Heritage Preservation from the New York Community Trust, as well as support from TALAS, have enabled purchase of supplies. The Center has also been outfitted with supplies from Materials for the Arts, a creative reuse program managed by the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs. Additional donations to FAIC have come from PINTA, The Modern & Contemporary Latin American Art Show; Tru Vue; Aon Huntington Block Insurance; Aon Foundation; members of AIC; and others. The American Museum of Natural History and MoMA have also provided key in-kind support for recovery efforts and establishment of the CRC.
CERT NYC
AIC-CERT Remains on Alert
Even though the response for SuperStorm Sandy was unprecedented for FAIC, AIC-CERT members continued to be ready to respond to other emergency situations. During December and January, even while staffing the CRC in New York City, AIC-CERT members assisted the Osage Historical Society in Oklahoma, which suffered from soot damage after a fire, and responded to soot damage from a furnace puff-back at the Oakham Historical Museum in Massachusetts.
More information about FAIC, AIC-CERT, and the Cultural Recovery Center can be found at www.conservation-us.org/disaster or by sending an email to info@conservation-us.org
FAIC

Two summer Internships at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum in objects conservation

A summer internship program has been launched at the National Air and Space Museum’s Udvar Hazy center in the brand new Emil Buehler laboratory located in Chantilly VA. Two, 10-week internship positions are available for students currently enrolled in a recognized training program, and/ or advance pre-program individuals with over 1,000 hrs of documented work experience. The two internships offered have specific research components (see descriptions below), in addition to providing hands-on treatments of modern materials.
Description of research for the first internship:
Research on the Aluminum Alloy Disconnects of Spacesuit gloves in the NASM Collection:
A conservation intern is required to assist NASM Conservation staff with primary research on the corrosion and conservation of aluminum alloy glove disconnects related to the space program. The intern will work in a team with NASM conservator Lisa Young, Malcolm Collum (Chief of Conservation), and the curator of the collection. The research will involve hands-on analysis and testing as well as literature searches, contact with industry experts and collaboration with Smithsonian conservators and scientists when deemed necessary.
Contact Lisa Young: YoungLA [at] si [dot] edu with questions regarding this research.
Description of research for the second internship:
Research consolidants and application methods for deteriorating polyurethane foam in the NASM collection:
A conservation intern is requested to collaborate with NASM Conservation staff in the evaluation of treatment methodologies for deteriorating polyurethane foam. This material is found as a component in many composite artifacts in the NASM collection and recent advances have identified new materials to help preserve polyurethane foam. The selected intern would be responsible for conducting hands-on testing and analysis complimented by literature searches and evaluation methods. The intern will work in a team with NASM conservator Lauren Horelick, Malcolm Collum (Chief of Conservation), curators and materials scientists. The intern will have access to other Smithsonian conservators and scientists when deemed necessary.
Contact Lauren Horelick:  Horelickl [at] si [dot] edu with any questions regarding this research.
Start / end dates: Monday, June 3-Friday, August 9, 2013.
Funded amount: $ 5,500.00 available for each intern.
Deadline for application: February, 15 2013

Procedure for application: All applications must be submitted on-line through the Smithsonian’s SOLAA web-site. After creating a username find the link to “Internships” and use the drop down menu for the Air and Space Museum (NASM) for further information about applying. Please specify in your statement of purpose which internship you are applying for. Also, please notify either Lauren Horelick or Lisa Young when you have completed your application so we can be sure it arrives at the correct place.
*Individuals not currently enrolled in school are welcome to apply. Disregard this eligibility requirement on the SOLAA website.

Questions: Application questions should be directed to Myra Banks-Scott: BanksScottM [at] si [dot] edu

Call for Papers: The American Schools of Oriental Research Annual Meeting

am2013banner-with-tabs
Sheraton Baltimore City Center Hotel
Baltimore, MD
November 20-23, 2013
The American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) is a non-profit 501 (c)3 organization that supports and encourages the study of the peoples and cultures of the Near East, from the earliest times to the present. The 2013 ASOR Annual Meeting will be held in Baltimore, MD, from November 20th to 23rd. The Annual Meeting is the yearly coming-together of ASOR’s vibrant academic community. The conference attracts over 900 scholars and enthusiasts of archaeology, linguistics, geography, epigraphy, anthropology, and other fields related to the study of the ancient Near East.
2013 Call for Papers
II. Abstract Submissions
An individual may submit an abstract/paper proposal to deliver a paper in one of the sessions detailed in the List of 2013 Sessions. Deadline for submission of abstracts for individual papers is February 15, 2013.
A. General Instructions for Individual Submissions
Session chairs will accept papers for presentation strictly on the basis of the quality of the abstract and its conformity to the following guidelines regarding content and format (see below). To be considered by session chairs, abstracts also must be submitted by the deadline (February 15, 2013), and proposers must be preregistered for the meeting (see Rules for Participation). Standards for acceptance will be the same for all abstracts submitted.
1. Abstracts for papers that fit into the sessions described in the List of 2013 Sessions should be submitted via the online abstract submission database on the ASOR website. The abstract will be forwarded to the correct Session Chair based on the session(s) noted on the form. For further information regarding the theme or other specific requirements of the session, we strongly suggest that you email the Session Chair in advance of the submission deadline.
2. Abstracts for papers that do NOT fit into established sessions or new Member-Organized sessions (available online by January 15, 2013) are also invited. For such papers, please select “Individual Submissions” on the online database.
3. If your interests are not met by an existing session, we suggest that you contact people with interests similar to yours and that you propose a new Member-Organized Session (deadline: December 15, 2012).
Proposers will be notified of acceptance or rejection of their papers by the ASOR office by April 30, 2013. Any questions concerning the status of papers should be addressed to the ASOR office (asorad [at] bu [dot] edu) (not to the Session Chair or to members of the Program Committee).
Further questions regarding academic sessions should be addressed to the co-chairs of the Program Committee: Andrew M. Smith II (amsii [at] gwu [dot] edu) and Elise A. Friedland (efried [at] gwu [dot]edu).
B. Content of Abstracts
The content of the paper should focus on the significance of the material or on proposed solutions to specific problems rather than on a descriptive narrative.
The SIGNIFICANCE of the author’s work should be stated explicitly.
CONCLUSIONS, as well as the evidence for them, should be presented clearly.
The TITLE should be precise and give sufficient information to allow for bibliographic indexing.
Bibliographic references should be kept to a minimum. PREVIOUS SCHOLARSHIP on the subject may be cited, if particularly relevant as a point of departure for clarifying the advances made in the author’s own work. See below for bibliographic format.
It is understood that excavators and others engaged in research in the field during the summer cannot provide conclusions by the February 15 deadline. Preliminary submission for reports on excavations and surveys, however, is required; submissions should be detailed and specific, and should include information on the precise objective of the project and its research design.
Time limits on all papers will be enforced.
C. Format of Abstracts
Abstracts should not exceed 250 words.
In the case of multiple authors, list the name of the person who will read the paper first. Each member may submit only ONE paper for which he/she is the reader.
Submitters/first authors/presenters MUST list ALL co-authors in the fields provided by the online abstract submission system at the time of submission and by the February 15 deadline.
If bibliographic references are included, these must follow the BASOR style as set forth in BASOR 294 (1994):16.
Abstracts should be submitted electronically as part of the online submission process.
Abstracts should be submitted electronically using ASOR’s online abstract submission system powered by Oxford Abstracts.

Make Your Voice Heard: Register for AAM's Museums Advocacy Day, February 25-26, 2013

It’s once again time for AAM’s Museums Advocacy Day! Registration for this year’s event, taking place February 25-26, closes this Friday, January 25. In light of the current economic climate and political gridlock, we need all the advocacy help we can get. Please note: AAM does not currently have anyone registered from the following states: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Mississippi, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming. If you can make the trip to Washington DC, February 25-26, please register for AAM Museums Advocacy day today. If you are from one of the urgent need states listed above, your participation is greatly needed. This year, there will be an “at home” component of Museums Advocacy day. So even if you can’t get to DC, please set aside some advocacy time for February 25-26. But remember–nothing beats an in-person visit to your elected representatives. We will send another email closer to the date with more details. Please consider making the trip to Washington, if it is possible for you. Remember to register by Friday, January 25. Register today >>

What does it mean when an insurance company says that a damaged work of art no longer exists

In the December 24 &31, 2012 issue of The New Yorker, Rebecca Mead wrote a Talk of the Town piece, “Zombie Art” about The Salvage Art Institute’s exhibit in the Arthur Ross Architecture Gallery at Columbia University called “No Longer Art” and a related symposium (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_lX9vW47sKs ) bringing considerable exposure to the category of “dead” or “salvage” art— i.e., damaged works of art for which the cost of conservation would be greater than the amount for which the works are insured. These works are therefore rendered as total losses by insurance companies and are sent to warehouses to live in limbo. In terms of the art market they no longer exist. However, they do exist physically and could be restored, raising existential ethical questions which conservators might well contemplate.

A forthcoming lecture on historic ceramic repair techniques

Image: Historic Deerfield, Inc.Mended china, like this 1700s English plate, will be the topic of a talk at the New York Ceramics Fair.
Image: Historic Deerfield, Inc.
Mended china, like this 1700s English plate, will be the topic of a talk at the New York Ceramics Fair.

According to the January 18, 2013 “Antiques” column of The New York Times (“It’s as Good as Glue: Mending Shattered China“, by Eve M. Kahn), a small chapter in the history of conservation will be presented to the public at the New York Ceramics Fair on January 23, 2013. Angelika Kuettner, Associate Registrar for Collections Documentation and Imaging and Assistant Curator of Ceramics at the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation will speak on “Simply Riveting: A Look at Broken and Mended Cermaics”, detailing the use of twine, metal and glue in the repair of fine china in the 18th and 19th century.

What will become of video art when there is no one let who can restore it?

According to a profile in the Wall Street Journal (“An Archivist Still Wired for Analog“, by Steve Dollar, December 22-23, 2012), seventy-one year old Chi-tien Lui, owner of CTL Electronics in the TriBeCa section of New York City since 1968, is one of the few people who still has the skills and knowledge required to restore video sculptures like those created by Nam June Paik from the 1960s until his death in 2006 (many of which are now on display in a retrospective at the Smithsonian American Art Museum).
It is unrealistic to expect conservation training programs to devote much course time to such a small and specialized group of art works. What will become of these works when replacement equipment is no longer available and Mr. Lui and his few colleagues are not here to execute custom modifications to the equipment that is?