This entry was originally posted on the INCCA-NA blog, and is being re-posted here with permission. To read the original entry, please go to http://incca-na.org/aic-great-debate/
Jessica Ford is a graduate fellow in paintings conservation at Winterthur/ University of Delaware. She is working this summer at the Dallas Museum of Art, and she will spend her third-year internship at the Smithsonian American Art Museum.
Kristin Adsit and The Clock stand by as Richard McCoy explains the debate format.
What was I thinking when I agreed to do the Great Debate? I asked myself this question countless times after the agreement was made. Instinctually, I knew I’d miss out on something important if I didn’t take part, this thought being fed primarily by the fact that it was the one and only Richard McCoy who had asked me to join in. Also, this was my first AIC meeting, so it was the only time I’d be able to claim in somewhat good conscience that I didn’t know what I was getting into. What I did know was that the Great Debate would involve publicly arguing about contentious issues with respected professionals in a field I am still in training to enter. It seemed best not to think about it too much, and just go for it.
For those who weren’t able to witness the event in the flesh, the second annual AIC Great Debate was held in a beautiful and intimidatingly large room featuring a cash bar. Two topics were discussed for 30 minutes each by teams that supported or opposed a stated position, and there were also question/answer sessions involving the audience. A key aspect was that the teams included individuals with varying backgrounds, who often did not personally support their assigned positions. Richard acted as moderator, expertly assisted by Laura Kubick, Kristen Adsit, and a huge ticking clock.
Smiles all around. Left to right: Jodie Utter, Rosa Lowinger, Patty Miller, yours truly at the podium, John Campbell, and Fletcher Durant.
My teammates were Fletcher Durant and John Campbell, and together we argued against the idea that “the greatest act of preservation for inherently fragile or fugitive cultural property is exhibition, even if the duration goes far beyond what is currently recommended.” Defending the statement was the impressive lineup of Rosa Lowinger, Patty Miller, and Jodie Utter. These three delivered truly inspiring arguments about how contemporary art must be made accessible to contemporary audiences, to ensure the survival of the cultural story they represent. Fragile artworks such as the Watts Towers and the artwork of Thornton Dial were cited as powerful examples. Hiding such artworks in storage was presented as elitist and more dangerous than display, considering the risks associated with overcrowding and neglect. My team and I were also called out for being too young (not such a bad insult) and naive (zing) to understand how a conservator’s practice must sometimes differ from his/her ideals.
Fletcher responded with some sass of his own, saying our elders on the opposing side were effectively leaving a trail of intentionally damaged artwork for the next generation of conservators to struggle with when they retire. He expressed the need for preventive preservation and for patience until the evolution of technology improves methods of display. In the meantime, I suggested creative use of surrogates and digital galleries to make artwork even more accessible than a physical display. John brought it all home with a final plug for the AIC Code of Ethics. What else should we need, really? I’m not one to deny the obvious, though, and the audience poll after the closing arguments was clear: the young’uns had been schooled.
Jessica, feeling slightly giddy with relief post-debate, stands beside moderator Richard McCoy.
Our discussion was followed with an even livelier and highly entertaining debate between new teams around the statement: “while volunteers used on preservation projects often allow us to accomplish more work, they undermine our capacity to regularly employ conservation and collections care professionals.” The extended question/answer session demonstrated that the audience was just as divided and passionate as those on stage. Carrie McNeal has already written a superb review of this portion of the debate here, and I hope you’ll read it! The compelling points made by both sides should not be missed.
What started out feeling like a slightly crazy decision to argue with strangers in public turned out to be a crazy good experience for an emerging conservator. I’m so proud to have taken the stage with my teammates and opponents, all terrific people that I look forward to seeing at future AIC meetings. It can be daunting to step outside one’s comfort zone in a professional setting, but that is the mission of the Great Debate. What makes it so “great” is that differing sides of prickly topics are explored at length and with good humor, breaking the ice and providing a baseline for future discussions. The good intentions of sensitivity and the excuses of passivity are magically eliminated for a few minutes. How often do we have time to do this as a group? I can’t wait to see which young conservators will take part in the next debate, helping to bring openness into the future of our field.
*All photo credits: Heather Brown
Author: Abigail Choudhury
ICOMOS Statement on Crac des Chevaliers and the continuing destruction of the cultural heritage of Syria
PRESS RELEASE: ICOMOS Statement on Crac des Chevaliers and the continuing destruction of the cultural heritage of Syria
ICOMOS, the International Council on Monuments and Sites, expresses its deep concern for the on-going destruction of cultural heritage in Syria, and stands with Syrian cultural heritage professionals for the protection of heritage places in the country.
The continuing conflict situation in Syria, which began in 2011, has led to an extensive humanitarian crisis and the destruction of many invaluable cultural heritage places, including World Heritage properties.
New media reports and video footage of the bombardment and damages to Crac des Chevaliers, one of Syria’s World Heritage properties, are of particular concern to ICOMOS.
Once again, by recalling the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict, to which the Syrian Arab Republic is a State Party, ICOMOS urges all parties to this armed conflict to respect and protect the cultural heritage. ICOMOS calls upon all parties to refrain from any use of cultural properties and their immediate surroundings for purposes, which are likely to expose cultural heritage sites to destruction or damage. The parties to this conflict should refrain from any act of hostility, directed against such places. ICOMOS insists on the demilitarization of all cultural heritage of Syria, including monuments and sites with outstanding universal value. ICOMOS further supports the decision of the World Heritage Committee suggesting that the Syrian Arab Republic consider ratifying the Second Protocol (1999) of 1954 Hague Convention.
Crac des Chevaliers and Qal’at Salah El-Din represent the most significant examples illustrating the exchange of influences and documenting the evolution of fortified architecture in the Near East during the time of the Crusades (11th – 13th centuries). Crac des Chevaliers, with further construction by the Mamluks in the 13th century, is among the best-preserved examples of the Crusader castles.
Unfortunately, this is not the first time during the current civil strife that the Syrian people and the international community are witnesses to the damages inflicted on the World Heritage properties of Syria. Many historic parts of the Ancient City of Aleppo, including its ancient markets (suks) and the Great Mosque, have suffered extensive damages, already since 2012.
The reports of illegal excavations in different archaeological sites, and reports of apparently planned and intentional destructions of symbolic monuments have also caused serious concerns.
Because of the continuing threats, all six Syrian World Heritage properties were inscribed on the List of World Heritage in Danger, at the 37th session of the World Heritage Committee, held in Cambodia last June:
Ancient City of Aleppo
Ancient City of Bosra
Ancient City of Damascus
Ancient Villages of Northern Syria
Crac des Chevaliers and Qal’at Salah El-Din
Site of Palmyra
The state of conservation of Syria’s cultural heritage during the on-going armed conflict is among the most urgent concerns for ICOMOS. It continues its efforts to support Syrian professionals and experts by delivering knowledge, providing technical consultancy, raising awareness, and building capacity.
ICOMOS, an Advisory Body of the World Heritage Committee and a founder organization of the Blue Shield, expresses its solidarity with Syrian cultural heritage organizations and professionals, and supports their appeal for the protection and recovery of cultural properties during and after the end of the current turmoil.
It places itself at the disposal of UNESCO for all actions undertaken to ensure the preservation of Syria’s six World Heritage properties currently listed as in danger.
Download the full statement (PDF – English/French)
Links:
Protection of Syria’s Cultural Heritage in Times of Armed Conflict: ICOMOS – ICCROM e-learning course for Syrian cultural heritage professionals
ICOMOS Statement on Aleppo, 27 July 2012
Blue Shield Statement on Syria
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
ICOMOS, the International Council on Monuments and Sites, is a unique, non-governmental, democratic, not for profit international organisation, committed to furthering the conservation, protection, use and enhancement of the world’s cultural heritage.
As an official advisory body to the World Heritage Committee for the implementation of the UNESCO World Heritage Convention, ICOMOS evaluates nominations and advises on the state of conservation of properties inscribed on the World Heritage List.
ICOMOS is one of the founding members of the Blue Shield network, working to protect the world’s cultural heritage threatened by armed conflict, natural and man-made disasters.
For more information see www.icomos.org
Preservation Week April 21-27, 2013
Preservation Week is coming soon—April 21-27! How can your institution or those institutions you work with promote Preservation Week? Propose a project that can be publicized and help make it happen. Need ideas? Start with these and suggest others:
• A public lecture on a preservation topic
• A behind-the-scenes preservation tour for school groups, special donors, or the board of trustees
• A condition survey of a particular collection with a summary provided for visitors (why this is an important step in preservation)
• A preservation quiz to give to visitors (with answers, of course!)
• Print outs to leave in galleries about the conservation of a particular piece on view
• Offering Guides for Taking Care of Your Personal Heritage to visitors (www.conservation-us.org/treasures)
Be a part of Preservation Week and be sure to spread the news!
PRESS RELEASE: Foundation Supports Ongoing Care of Collections After Devastation of Superstorm Sandy
>>> This press release can be found on our website at http://bit.ly/crcpress <<<
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
March 21, 2013
Contact: Eric Pourchot
Phone: (202) 661-8061
Email: epourchot@conservation-us.org
Foundation Supports Ongoing Care of Collections After Devastation of Superstorm Sandy
WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Foundation of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works (FAIC) has completed work at the Cultural Recovery Center (CRC) in Brooklyn, NY after serving a community of artists and organizations in dire need of assistance. The CRC offered space and help at no cost to owners of artworks damaged as a result of Superstorm Sandy. Volunteer assistance and work space was provided to museums, libraries, archives, historic sites, galleries, collectors, and artists. While full conservation treatment was not covered, guidance and assistance in the cleaning and stabilization of art and cultural materials was.
23 members of the AIC Collections Emergency Response Team (AIC-CERT) contributed 128 days of professional volunteer services in New York and New Jersey. At least 34 additional conservators from the region also volunteered. At the CRC, volunteers worked with nineteen artists on hundreds of items, including paintings, works on paper, photographs, textiles, and multi-media works. Many of the works were at risk because of toxic deposits and potential mold growth.
The Center for Cultural Recovery was operated by The Foundation of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works (FAIC), in cooperation with a consortium of organizations:
Alliance for Response New York City
Heritage Preservation
New York City Department of Cultural Affairs
New York Regional Association for Conservation
Industry City at Bush Terminal
Smithsonian Institution
Initial funding for the response and recovery efforts, including initial costs for the Center, was provided by a leadership gift to FAIC from Sotheby’s. A grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation allowed the Center to remain open through March 8. Industry City at Bush Terminal provided the space rent-free. Rapid Refile set up containment tents and air scrubbers to prevent the spread of mold from incoming objects to cleaned objects. Collector Systems provided free use of its web-based collection management system. The Smithsonian Institution and a grant to Heritage Preservation from the New York Community Trust, as well as support from TALAS, enabled purchase of supplies. The Center was also outfitted with supplies from Materials for the Arts, a creative reuse program managed by the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs. Additional donations to FAIC came from PINTA, The Modern & Contemporary Latin American Art Show; Tru Vue; Aon Huntington Block Insurance; Aon Foundation; members of AIC; and others. The American Museum of Natural History and MoMA also provided key in-kind support for recovery efforts and establishment of the CRC.
As the need for conservation continues, those with damaged pieces are encouraged to use AIC’s Find A Conservator tool available for free on the AIC website: www.conservation-us.org/findaconservator . The tool provides a systematic, consistent method of obtaining current information to identify and locate professional conservation services from all across the United States and abroad. It allows users to address a wide range of conservation problems, whether the needs are long-range or short-term and whether the collection consists of thousands of valuable historic artifacts, one priceless work of art, or items of great personal value.
# # #
About FAIC
FAIC, the Foundation of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic & Artistic Works, supports conservation education, research, and outreach activities that increase understanding of our global cultural heritage.
Preservation EXPOsed!
National Archives and Records Administration presents Preservation EXPOsed!
March 14, 2013
11:00 a.m to 2:00 p.m.
William G. McGowan Theater and Lobby
National Archives Building
7th Street and Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC
Learn about preservation and caring for your personal treasures at the 2013 Preservation EXPO. Hear preservation lectures and bring in a document, book, photograph, artifact, motion picture, photographic film or audio recording for a consultation with a NARA Conservator on how to preserve it. Appointments are required for individual consultations. Please contact Preservation by email at preservation@nara.gov or call Preservation Programs Officer, Allison Olson at 301-837-0678 to schedule one.
Attendees should enter the National Archives Building through the Special Events Entrance on Constitution Avenue between 7th and 9th Streets, NW.
http://www.archives.gov/preservation/exposed-2013.html
27th Annual National Archives Preservation Conference
Hot Trends in Response and Recovery: 40 Years After the Fire
Date: Thursday, June 27, 2013
http://www.archives.gov/preservation/conferences/2013/
A program schedule will be posted when speakers have been confirmed.
Cost: TBA
Location:
National Archives at St. Louis
One Archives Drive
St. Louis, MO 63138
About the Conference
The National Archives will commemorate the 1973 fire that occurred at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) with its 2013 Preservation Conference, Hot Trends in Response and Recovery: 40 Years After the Fire. The conference will be held at the new National Archives in St. Louis facility, dedicated in October, 2011, to mark the 40th anniversary of that devestating event. The June 27th one-day conference is the first time the popular conference has moved outside of the Washington, DC metro area. Sponsored by Preservation Programs at the National Archives, the annual conference attracts a national audience of archivists, librarians, facilities managers and administrators, conservators, preservation specialists and reformatting experts.
The immense 1973 fire and its long-lasting impact on our nation’s records and veterans provide the context for the conference. Speakers will discuss the latest approaches in risk assessment, fire prevention and building design to protect archives and cultural heritage. New trends that enhance emergency response will be explored: models of community collaboration, the impact of social media, and the psychology of disasters. National Archives staff will also describe ongoing efforts to preserve fire-damaged records and join with other experts to share the latest tools and technologies in image recovery.
A complete list of speakers and registration information will be posted in the coming weeks.
Contact
For information please contact the Conference Coordinator: Richard Schneider, 301-837-3617
Why We Assist in Disasters
In a series of posts on the University of Iowa Libraries Preservation Beat blog, Nancy Kraft, AIC-CERT team member and Preservation Librarian, reflects on her work at the Cultural Recovery Center in Brooklyn.
Friday, February 15, 2013
Those of us who volunteer to assist in disaster response are, obviously, not in it for the money. Private conservators are not getting paid while volunteering. Many of us are away from family and friends, work hard and go to bed exhausted during recovery efforts. So what is in it for us?
For me, as for many of us, it is the giving back to our community, assisting in saving our culture, and the joy of helping someone preserve a little bit of his/her history. The piece below is a perfect example. I captured the title “For Matthew, May 14-May 15, 1976″ commemorating the birth of the artist’s son.
Read more of Nancy’s posts here:
Teaching Moments at CRC
Busy Day at the Cultural Recovery Center in Brooklyn
An Artist’s Quandary
Assessment and Cleaning
Assisting Artists After Hurricane Sandy
Salvaging Artists’ Works After Hurricane Sandy
Read the University of Iowa Libraries Preservation Beat blog: http://blog.lib.uiowa.edu/preservation/
With thanks to Nancy Kraft and the University of Iowa Libraries for permission to re-post this information on our blog.
Cultural Recovery Center Update
FAIC Responds to Cultural Disasters
Founded in 2007, the AIC Collections Emergency Response Team (AIC-CERT) is comprised of conservators and other museum professionals trained to respond to disasters affecting cultural institutions. Managed by the Foundation of the American Institute for Conservation (FAIC), AIC-CERT volunteers have provided assistance and advice to dozens of museums, libraries, and archives in the wake of natural disasters including tropical storms, floods, hurricanes, and even the 2010 earthquake in Haiti. In 2007 and again in 2010, FAIC received funding from the Institute of Museum & Library Services to support an advanced training program that resulted in a force of 107 “rapid responders” adept at assessing damage and initiating salvage of cultural collections after a disaster has occurred.
AIC-CERT: the SWAT Team for Art
Hurricane Sandy caused an enormous amount of damage and loss of life. The storm was equally disastrous for the arts and culture community. It struck the Northeast at the end of October, 2012 and combined with other weather patterns and high tides to form a “Super Storm.” Requests for assistance quickly came in through the AIC-CERT hotline and from Alliance for Response New York City (AFRNYC). Many collecting institutions throughout the region were affected, but small galleries and individual artists were especially hard hit in the low-lying neighborhoods of New York City.
By March 1, 23 AIC-CERT members will have contributed 125 days of professional volunteer services in New York and New Jersey.
“If the cultural industry has a SWAT team for visual art, it is the AIC’s Collections Emergency Response Team (AIC-CERT)”
– Pia Catton, Wall Street Journal, November 18, 2012
Before the storm hit, AIC-CERT had already begun preparations. Media releases on October 26 encouraged emergency preparedness and provided institutions with the AIC-CERT hotline number (202-661-8068). As of December 4, 2012, FAIC’s Collections Emergency Response Team (AIC-CERT) hotline had received over 120 requests for assistance, and all have been followed up with appropriate phone, email, and in-person visits by volunteers. Fourteen AIC-CERT members from across the country responded to the initial calls, organized by Beth Antoine (the AIC-CERT Coordinator), who was working overtime to meet the demand. In addition, FAIC contracted with Cynthia Albertson, a conservator at MOMA, to coordinate the many professionals in the New York area who wished to assist. Twenty-eight local volunteers worked with AIC-CERT in the initial response. Some of the larger projects included the Martha Graham collection; individual artists at the Westbeth Artists Residence; and various artists and galleries in Chelsea and Brooklyn. Multi-day power outages in lower Manhattan and other neighborhoods, subway line closures, and area gas rationing complicated the response.
Because of the physical, cultural, and economic geography of the New York region, a disproportionate number of artists and private galleries were the hardest hit by the storm. Four to six feet of surging water caused physical damage as well as water damage. Although volunteers were able to help move and dry materials in the first weeks, it became clear that artists would need a great deal of space, guidance, and equipment in order to remove toxic coatings and prevent mold from destroying works that seemed to be “saved.” A review of the services provided through early December showed that at least 24 collections were in need of further work, and that space, equipment, and expert advice would be needed.
The Cultural Recovery Center
To address the need for further assistance, FAIC opened the Cultural Recovery Center (CRC), an 18,000 square foot space in Brooklyn, to provide space, equipment, supplies, and volunteer expertise to assist artists and owners of damaged works to clean, decontaminate, and stabilize their paintings, works on paper, sculpture, textiles, photographs, and other objects. FAIC took possession of the space on December 10, and begin providing services to its first artist on December 13.
Opening the facility not only required physical preparation, but administrative support as well. Policies and procedures for the facility were developed; a job description for the studio manager position was created; phone numbers and email addresses organized, and so on. The Studio Manager, Anna Studebaker, formerly manager of the objects conservation lab at the Metropolitan Museum, began work on December 18. She coordinates the work at the CRC, including scheduling artists, signing volunteers in and out, making sure volunteers are working safely, maintaining records of the work, ensuring supplies are in stock, and keeping in communication with the volunteer coordinators and FAIC staff. The overall project is managed by Eric Pourchot, FAIC Institutional Advancement Director.
In the first month of operations, the CRC worked with seven artists on 555 works, including paintings, works on papers, photographs, textiles, and multi-media works. Twelve conservators volunteered 22 days of time working with artists at the Center.
Several artists are still in the queue to bring their works to the Center, including a painter who has had many of his paintings and works on paper worked on at the Center already, but has more in storage still to be assessed and cleaned; a photographer who is seeking space to rinse and dry approximately 40,000 images; textile artists; sculptors; electronic media creators; and many others whose works are at risk because of toxic deposits and potential mold growth. The Cultural Recovery Center will remain open through March 1st in order to handle the requests for services.
This would not have been possible without …
Initial funding for the response and recovery efforts, including initial costs for the Center, was provided by a leadership gift to FAIC from Sotheby’s. A grant from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation allowed the Center to remain open through March 1. Industry City at Bush Terminal provided the space rent-free. Rapid Refile set up containment tents and air scrubbers to prevent the spread of mold from incoming objects to cleaned objects. Collector Systems has provided free use of its web-based collection management system. The Smithsonian Institution and a grant to Heritage Preservation from the New York Community Trust, as well as support from TALAS, have enabled purchase of supplies. The Center has also been outfitted with supplies from Materials for the Arts, a creative reuse program managed by the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs. Additional donations to FAIC have come from PINTA, The Modern & Contemporary Latin American Art Show; Tru Vue; Aon Huntington Block Insurance; Aon Foundation; members of AIC; and others. The American Museum of Natural History and MoMA have also provided key in-kind support for recovery efforts and establishment of the CRC.
AIC-CERT Remains on Alert
Even though the response for SuperStorm Sandy was unprecedented for FAIC, AIC-CERT members continued to be ready to respond to other emergency situations. During December and January, even while staffing the CRC in New York City, AIC-CERT members assisted the Osage Historical Society in Oklahoma, which suffered from soot damage after a fire, and responded to soot damage from a furnace puff-back at the Oakham Historical Museum in Massachusetts.
More information about FAIC, AIC-CERT, and the Cultural Recovery Center can be found at www.conservation-us.org/disaster or by sending an email to info@conservation-us.org
Call for Papers: The American Schools of Oriental Research Annual Meeting
Sheraton Baltimore City Center Hotel
Baltimore, MD
November 20-23, 2013
The American Schools of Oriental Research (ASOR) is a non-profit 501 (c)3 organization that supports and encourages the study of the peoples and cultures of the Near East, from the earliest times to the present. The 2013 ASOR Annual Meeting will be held in Baltimore, MD, from November 20th to 23rd. The Annual Meeting is the yearly coming-together of ASOR’s vibrant academic community. The conference attracts over 900 scholars and enthusiasts of archaeology, linguistics, geography, epigraphy, anthropology, and other fields related to the study of the ancient Near East.
2013 Call for Papers
II. Abstract Submissions
An individual may submit an abstract/paper proposal to deliver a paper in one of the sessions detailed in the List of 2013 Sessions. Deadline for submission of abstracts for individual papers is February 15, 2013.
A. General Instructions for Individual Submissions
Session chairs will accept papers for presentation strictly on the basis of the quality of the abstract and its conformity to the following guidelines regarding content and format (see below). To be considered by session chairs, abstracts also must be submitted by the deadline (February 15, 2013), and proposers must be preregistered for the meeting (see Rules for Participation). Standards for acceptance will be the same for all abstracts submitted.
1. Abstracts for papers that fit into the sessions described in the List of 2013 Sessions should be submitted via the online abstract submission database on the ASOR website. The abstract will be forwarded to the correct Session Chair based on the session(s) noted on the form. For further information regarding the theme or other specific requirements of the session, we strongly suggest that you email the Session Chair in advance of the submission deadline.
2. Abstracts for papers that do NOT fit into established sessions or new Member-Organized sessions (available online by January 15, 2013) are also invited. For such papers, please select “Individual Submissions” on the online database.
3. If your interests are not met by an existing session, we suggest that you contact people with interests similar to yours and that you propose a new Member-Organized Session (deadline: December 15, 2012).
Proposers will be notified of acceptance or rejection of their papers by the ASOR office by April 30, 2013. Any questions concerning the status of papers should be addressed to the ASOR office (asorad [at] bu [dot] edu) (not to the Session Chair or to members of the Program Committee).
Further questions regarding academic sessions should be addressed to the co-chairs of the Program Committee: Andrew M. Smith II (amsii [at] gwu [dot] edu) and Elise A. Friedland (efried [at] gwu [dot]edu).
B. Content of Abstracts
The content of the paper should focus on the significance of the material or on proposed solutions to specific problems rather than on a descriptive narrative.
The SIGNIFICANCE of the author’s work should be stated explicitly.
CONCLUSIONS, as well as the evidence for them, should be presented clearly.
The TITLE should be precise and give sufficient information to allow for bibliographic indexing.
Bibliographic references should be kept to a minimum. PREVIOUS SCHOLARSHIP on the subject may be cited, if particularly relevant as a point of departure for clarifying the advances made in the author’s own work. See below for bibliographic format.
It is understood that excavators and others engaged in research in the field during the summer cannot provide conclusions by the February 15 deadline. Preliminary submission for reports on excavations and surveys, however, is required; submissions should be detailed and specific, and should include information on the precise objective of the project and its research design.
Time limits on all papers will be enforced.
C. Format of Abstracts
Abstracts should not exceed 250 words.
In the case of multiple authors, list the name of the person who will read the paper first. Each member may submit only ONE paper for which he/she is the reader.
Submitters/first authors/presenters MUST list ALL co-authors in the fields provided by the online abstract submission system at the time of submission and by the February 15 deadline.
If bibliographic references are included, these must follow the BASOR style as set forth in BASOR 294 (1994):16.
Abstracts should be submitted electronically as part of the online submission process.
Abstracts should be submitted electronically using ASOR’s online abstract submission system powered by Oxford Abstracts.
FAIC Cultural Recovery Center Now Open and Accepting Damaged Works in Brooklyn
The Foundation of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works (FAIC) announces the opening of the Cultural Recovery Center (CRC) in Brooklyn, NY. The CRC is offering space and to help owners of artworks damaged as a result of Superstorm Sandy. The CRC will offer volunteer assistance and work space to museums, libraries, archives, historic sites, galleries, collectors, and artists. The goal is not to provide free conservation treatment, but to provide guidance and assistance in the cleaning and stabilization of art and cultural materials.
Artists and others in need of assistance are invited to contact the Cultural Recovery Center by phone: 718-757-2140 or by email: culturalrecoverycenter@gmail.com Information about the size of the collection, type of objects, and damage will be collected in order to ensure that appropriate space, equipment, and expertise will be available. Space at the CRC is limited, so all works must be received by appointment only.
The Cultural Recovery Center is located on 33rd Street in Brooklyn, in the Industry City at Bush Terminal facilities, near the 36th Street stop on the D, N, or R lines. Normal operating hours are 9-5, Monday through Friday. The Center will be closed on all Federal holidays as well as December 31.
Conservator Tara Kennedy cleans mold off of works of art on paper by artist Ronnie Landfield at the Cultural Recovery Center
The Center for Cultural Recovery is operated by The Foundation of the American Institute for Conservation of Historic and Artistic Works (FAIC), in cooperation with a consortium of organizations:
Alliance for Response New York City
Heritage Preservation
New York City Department of Cultural Affairs
New York Regional Association for Conservation
Industry City at Bush Terminal
Smithsonian Institution
Funding for the Center has been provided by a leadership gift to FAIC from Sotheby’s. The Smithsonian Institution and a grant to Heritage Preservation from the New York Community Trust, as well as support from TALAS, have enabled purchase of supplies. The Center has also been outfitted with supplies from Materials for the Arts, a creative reuse program managed by the New York City Department of Cultural Affairs. Rapid Refile has provided air filtration equipment. Additional donations to FAIC have come from PINTA, The Modern & Contemporary Latin American Art Show; Tru Vue; Huntington T. Block, members of the American Institute for Conservation; and others. The American Museum of Natural History and the Museum of Modern Art have also provided key support for recovery efforts.